After a number of current sports activities betting controversies, the Southeastern Convention (SEC) is now contemplating obligatory harm studies. The hope is that the studies would assist make the knowledge obtainable to the betting public whereas easing playing strain on athletes.
To date, the plan has the assist of at the least some coaches and athletic administrators.
“If it helps with playing then I’m all for it,” Georgia coach Kirby Good instructed USA At present. “If it’s geared to getting information on the market that persons are making an attempt to get from our student-athletes and it protects them, I’m definitely for that.”
Rising Issues
Damage studies are supposed to assist curtail potential compromising conditions for athletes, in addition to to make this info obtainable to everybody, relatively than potential unscrupulous bettors looking for it out from athletes or college and convention insiders.
The SEC seems to be on the forefront of this effort. The NCAA doesn’t at the moment mandate weekly harm studies, regardless of current efforts to guard gamers from strain associated to playing. In April, the NCAA started lobbying states to ban prop bets on faculty athletes, for instance.
A complete of 39 states (additionally together with Washington D.C. and the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico) now provide legalized sports activities betting in some type.
Coaches and convention officers have since turn out to be involved in regards to the giant sum of money within the trade and the way which may have an effect on athletes.
“Whenever you begin to see the variety of {dollars} being wager on legalized sports activities playing round faculty sports activities, not simply soccer, however males’s and ladies’s basketball, volleyball and baseball and softball, all these catch your consideration,” SEC commissioner Greg Sankey instructed USA At present. “We now have to be considerate about how info is managed.”
